HyperNormalisation Page #6
- Year:
- 2016
- 166 min
- 6,546 Views
the Capitulation Department.
Get off of your stick, Mr. President.
The American people are sick and
tired of being kicked around.
You talk tough,
let's see you use some of
these billions and billions
and billions of dollars' worth of weapons
that you've asked us to approve.
President Reagan immediately announced
definitely behind the attacks.
These murderers could not carry out their crimes
without the sanctuary and support
provided by regimes such as
Colonel Gaddafi's in Libya.
The Rome and Vienna murders are only the latest
in a series of brutal terrorist acts
committed with Gaddafi's backing.
But the European security services
who investigated the attacks
were convinced that Libya was not involved at all
and that the mastermind behind the
attacks was, in fact, Syria -
that the terrorists had been directed
by the Syrian intelligence agencies.
But the Americans say that
the attack at Rome Airport
was organised by Gaddafi, not by Damascus.
What do you say?
- No, we don't have any evidence...
- You have no evidence?
...supporting such an... affirmation.
The only evidence we have
shows a Syrian connection.
You say that it was Libya and the President
said the evidence of Libya's
culpability was irrefutable.
Yeah.
But the Italian authorities to
whom I've spoken say emphatically
on the record that their investigations have shown
that it was entirely masterminded by Syria.
I don't agree with that at all.
Well, they interrogated the surviving terrorists.
I must just say I don't agree with that.
But you've no evidence that Libya
was in on the planning either.
circumstantial, but very strong.
But why does the President
then say it's "irrefutable",
if you call it "circumstantial"?
Well, people can be convicted
and sentenced in our courts
on circumstantial evidence.
But what made it even more confusing
was that although there seemed to be no evidence
that Gaddafi had been behind the attacks,
he made no attempt to deny the allegations.
Instead, he went the other way
and turned the crisis into a global drama...
It is not a time of saying.
It is a time of war,
a time of confrontation.
...threatening suicide attacks against America.
TRANSLATION:
Gaddafi now started to play a role
that was going to become very familiar.
He grabbed the publicity
that had been given to him
by the Americans and used it dramatically.
international revolutionary
who would help to liberate oppressed
peoples around the world,
even the blacks in America.
Gaddafi arranged for a live satellite link
to a mass meeting of the
Nation Of Islam in Chicago.
Brothers and sisters,
privilege that I present to you
the leader of the al-Fateh Revolution from Libya,
our brother Muammar al-Gaddafi.
APPLAUSE:
Gaddafi told them that Libya was now their ally
in their struggle against white America.
...to express my full support
and support of my country
to your struggle for freedom, for emancipation.
Gaddafi promised that he would supply weapons
to create a black army in America of 400,000 men.
accept blacks as US citizens,"
he told them, "it must therefore be destroyed."
Gaddafi also invited a group
to come to Libya to build him a rocket.
He insisted that it had no military purpose.
Libya was now going to explore outer space.
I think it is peaceful and civil...
Civilian?
...civilian activity
for investigation of space
and something like this...
and...
it has nothing to do with any military things.
But no-one believed him.
Journalists warned that Gaddafi was
really preparing to attack Europe,
vividly dramatising the new danger.
That is something like this
which goes that way to put something into space.
But the same device tilted,
say, to an angle of 45 degrees
could, of course, become
something very different -
a missile possibly carrying a warhead.
range of an enormous area.
A chilling proposition with its range of 2,000km.
The Americans and Gaddafi
in a cycle of mutual reinforcement.
In the process, a powerful new image was created
imagination of the West.
Gaddafi became a global supervillain,
at the head of what was called a "rogue state" -
a madman who threatened the
stability of the world.
And Gaddafi was loving every minute of it.
So, you think, in the past,
his decisions sometimes have
been taken too quickly...
- Maybe, maybe. - ...on world affairs?
- Maybe.
I think, sometimes, that is what
has made people in the world
- nervous of you, perhaps?
- Maybe.
HE CHUCKLES:
Then, there was another terrorist attack
at a discotheque in West Berlin.
A bomb killed an American
soldier and injured hundreds.
they said were intercepts
by the National Security Agency
that proved that Colonel
Gaddafi was behind the bombing
and a dossier that they said proved
that he was also the mastermind
behind a whole range of other attacks.
President Reagan ordered the Pentagon
to prepare to bomb Libya.
But again, there were doubts -
this time, within the American Government itself.
There were concerns that
analysts were being pressured
to make a case that didn't really exist...
...and to do it, they were taking
Gaddafi's rhetoric about himself
as a global revolutionary and his manic ravings
and then re-presenting them as fact.
And, in the process, together,
the Americans and Gaddafi were
constructing a fictional world.
The analysts were certainly, I'm convinced...
pressured into developing a prima facie case
against the Libyan Government.
From the somewhat incoherent ravings of a maniac,
both interceptions of a clandestine nature
and interceptions of an open
radio broadcast or whatever,
as well as other sources, quotations of his,
one can assemble a neatly-put-together package
demonstrating that the man had violent interests
against the United States and its European allies.
The European intelligence agencies
told the Americans that they were wrong,
that it was Syria that was
behind the bombing, not Libya.
But the Americans had decided to attack Libya
because they couldn't face
the dangerous consequences
of attacking Syria.
Instead, they went for Gaddafi,
a man without friends or allies.
Libya had less downsided
consequences, if you will.
There's less Arab support for Gaddafi,
we figured there would be less
Soviet support for Gaddafi.
There's no question that Libya was
more vulnerable than Syria and Iran.
- He was a soft target?
- And that is certainly an element, of course.
In April 1986, the Americans attacked Libya.
Their targets included
Colonel Gaddafi's own house.
Immediately after the attack,
Gaddafi appeared in the ruins
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"HyperNormalisation" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 28 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/hypernormalisation_10432>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In