Inequality for All Page #3
Now, see, this box
is really important.
I travel not only
with my MINI Cooper
but with my box.
Hello, George.
How are you?
You are so kind
to bring the box.
We have one for you too.
It's the same room and...
In recent years,
I've discovered
that I actually have
a very, very rare
genetic condition.
It's Fairbanks Syndrome
that is responsible
for me being very short.
- Hey, Bob, let me carry that.
- No, no, no, that's fine.
My grandmother
always said to me,
"Don't worry,"
'cause when I hit
about 10 or 11 or 12,
I'm gonna,
you know,
have a real growth spurt.
And then I got to be
about 10, 11,
and nothing happened, you know?
Right up this way to the right.
Right this way.
Yup, behind you.
I grew up in the shadow
of World War II.
My father was in the war.
We were middle-class.
My father sold dresses.
My first job in Washington
was working as a summer intern
for Robert Kennedy.
It was a time
when there were kind of giants.
Robert F. Kennedy,
Martin Luther King,
they were all
trying to change society.
There was a sense
of possibility.
It kind of turned me on
to politics.
A few years later, I was picked
to be a Rhodes Scholar.
In those days,
all the Rhodes Scholars
who were selected
took a boat to England.
The problem was, you know,
when you go over there,
the Atlantic Ocean
is pretty rough.
You know, I and most
were sick,
and I went down to my cabin.
You know,
And then there was a knock
on the door,
and this fellow was there,
this kind of tall,
gangly Southerner,
and he had chicken soup
in one hand
and crackers in the other,
and he said, "I hear
you aren't feeling too well.
My name is Bill Clinton."
At Oxford,
we were at the same college.
We kept in touch.
At Oxford,
and philosophy.
But those experiences
really were a study for me
of the rules by which
markets are organized.
And this is an important point,
and it's one
that's very often lost,
but it was the focus
of my attention.
You see, there's no such thing
as a perfectly free market
anywhere.
Government sets the rules
by which the market functions.
All of these rules
are necessary
in order to construct
a free market.
The real question is,
and who do they hurt?
And in the last 30 years,
as the structure of the economy
began to shift,
many of the rules
governing our market
began to shift as well.
Today we're going
to try to explain
the mystery of why inequality
has been widening.
Remember, the economy is growing
all of this time.
The economy is...
The economy continues to grow.
Look, here is
from 1929 to 2011.
The economy overall
has done extremely well,
and productivity
keeps on increasing.
We are producing
more and more and more
and more and more value.
That's a big, big
success story.
But here is the problem.
Here's the puzzle.
Because if you look
at the average hourly earnings
of production workers,
continued to rise
until the late 1970s,
and then something happened,
flattening wages.
Look at the gap.
Something happened
in the late 1970s.
Something happened
in the late 1970s, folks.
In the late 1970s,
I was at
I was looking
at a lot of studies
about the direction
that the economy was going in.
More of American manufacturing
was beginning to move abroad.
There was the beginnings
of a technological revolution.
Financial markets were becoming
a little bit more powerful.
There was a move to deregulate.
Well, you connect the dots,
and all of these
begin to look as if
they're connected somehow
to this widening inequality.
For example, we knew that
labor unions were declining.
And that decline mirrored
almost exactly
the decline
in the middle class' share
of national income.
The hard part is stepping back
and seeing the big picture.
Many people, even to this day,
say that the decline of unions
really was attributable
the air traffic controllers.
Strike, strike, strike,
strike, strike, strike...
I must tell those who failed
to report for duty this morning,
they have forfeited their jobs
and will be terminated.
There's no question
that beginning in the late '70s
the air traffic controllers,
there was a major assault
on unions.
Employers did try to prevent
unions from being formed
much more aggressively
than before...
- I'll go.
- You don't have to hang on to me.
And employers fought
to bust unions
that were already there.
because they felt they had to
in order to maintain
their competitiveness
given so many other companies
that were nonunion
in the United States
and also many companies abroad.
The major underlying issue
was two interrelated things:
Globalization and technology.
I mean, you hear the word
"globalization"
over and over and over again.
Globalization, globalization,
globalization.
Rarely has a word gone
so directly
from obscurity
to meaninglessness
without any intervening period
of coherence.
Can anybody lend me
their iPhone for a moment?
Anybody have one that...
great.
Thank you.
I don't have one,
and I've really wanted
to have one.
Where do most of your dollars go
when you buy an iPhone?
What do you think?
Let's go.
Let's do the bidding.
A little over 700 of you
have these clickers,
which is great.
You say mostly
to the United States,
some of you say to China,
and then some of you say...
a few of you say Japan.
11 of you think Germany.
Well, here is where
your dollars go.
Most of your dollars
are going to Japan.
Some of your dollars
are going to Germany.
In fact, Germany
is the biggest...
is the second-biggest one.
South Korea's the third,
and here,
6% of your dollars
are going to the United States,
and only 3.6% of your dollars
are going to China.
Now, it's assembled in China.
Do you get this?
It's assembled in China,
but the assembly is of pieces
from all over the place.
Everything is coming
from everywhere.
it's not just
cost of wages or labor.
It's also which country's
workers add what value.
My MINI Cooper
is made by a foreign company.
But where a company's
headquartered
means less and less
in this new global economy.
Technologies
like cargo ships, containers,
satellite communication
technologies,
and eventually
computers and the internet,
these technologies enabled
the production process
to be parceled out
around the world.
Large numbers of American
manufacturing workers
began to lose their jobs,
which meant it inevitably
began undercutting
the wages of a lot
of working Americans.
Even factories
remaining in the United States
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Inequality for All" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/inequality_for_all_10812>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In