Is Genesis History? Page #9
Well, it's because the paradigm takes you to your conclusions.
The paradigm is that it has to be old,
so we choose the methods that give us an old fossil.
Something that does not give us an old fossil, such as weaving,
we must reject it or explain it otherwise.
At least for me, and of course, I'm not a microbiologist,
but I think most people would say ...
... it seems reasonable to think ...
... maybe they are not so old.
This clearly violates the dating process.
If dinosaur fossils have been dated incorrectly
and I would say this is clear evidence that they have been,
then it is very likely that fossils of any organism ...
... han been incorrectly dated
and then the same geological eras are incorrect.
What you're saying is that if you take the notion ...
... a long period of time,
you are drawing a great foundation of the conventional paradigm.
Absolutely.
In fact, time is the critical component of evolution.
If you're going to say a simple cellular system ...
... it became a multicellular system, which then turned into fish,
and then the fish jumped to Earth ...
... and they grew legs and started breathing air,
and then that creature he grew feathers ...
... and wings and he began to fly.
So if you give us time, we realize ...
... all these massive changes in organisms,
but we need time.
Everything seemed to return to the question of time.
I remembered that Andrew said Charles Darwin ...
... he accepted the millions of years first,
and then he adjusted his theory of evolution that assumption.
But why time is such an important element for evolution?
Rob Carter is a marine biologist ...
... so he took me to dive ...
... to give a glimpse into a world that most people do not see.
His specialty is the coral ...
... and he knew a lot about the amazing creatures ...
... that inhabit the reefs around St. Thomas.
Oh man, we have sharks here.
Look how they move ...
... and it's almost as effortless glide.
I wish I could swim well.
Engineers wanted we could do boats like that.
Submarines they could move as efficiently as a shark,
but simply can not.
So from your perspective as a marine biologist,
and I know you've studied a lot about the area of genetics,
when people talk about evolution, what is it?
How do you define evolution?
The word means change over time ...
... but I believe in change over time,
but I'm not an evolutionist.
So how do we solve it?
In fact, evolution is a belief ...
... that enough changes over time,
through sufficient time,
They can lead to the common ancestor of all species on Earth.
So that's the part that rejection.
I mean, look at these sharks here.
We have different species of sharks.
When God created, he put into these bodies ...
... the ability to change, adapt,
to respond dynamically to the environment.
But they are still sharks.
And when we look at the fossil record, they are still sharks.
People have heard the phrase the "missing link"
and usually they think of the link between man and monkey.
... among almost all major groups of animals ...
... and almost every other major groups of plants and animals ...
... and bacteria through the entire fossil record,
It is indicating very strong so that these are ...
... different creatures actually.
So we do not see one type or family becoming another species?
No.
The theory of evolution requires small,
random changes can explain everything we see, but can not.
Because they can not?
Because life is so complex ...
... that small changes can not explain it.
Just like you can not have an operating system of a computer ...
... and watch it and say, oh right, this was built ...
... one digit at a time over a long period of time.
No, it required an intelligent person to sit ...
... and build it.
Well, I can guarantee you as someone who was in that world ...
... that if anyone in the area of computer science ...
... said that if we change some things random ...
... on this operating system will improve.
I mean, nobody would agree with that.
No, we will not get a shark evolve into a bird.
The number of changes and exchange rates ...
... they are not something you can make one change at a time.
This is a sea urchin.
Luce thorny.
It is pointed. You must be careful.
Will I stay stuck when you touch it?
No, it is pointed but ...
OMG! They are moving.
Yes, they are moving.
And among thorns are small tube feet,
especially in the bottom.
Look at that move.
So he walks with their spines with these little tube feet here,
and that's what you use to attach to things.
But looking carefully there is one, two, three, four, five,
six, seven, in fact there are ten radials in this animal.
In fact, the starfish is his cousin.
Is seriously? You can not be serious.
Absolutely.
Starfish is an echinoderm ...
... but note that has a pentaradial symmetry instead of 10 parts.
This starfish.
At the bottom, look, we see the thorns.
We see the tube feet.
So there are similarities here?
... though outwardly they look totally different.
Very different.
You want to see something that looks very different ...
Clear.
... which it is also cousin of the starfish and sea urchins?
It's okay.
Almost it looks like a rock.
Yes, yes, I must be careful.
He is dripping above.
This is a sea cucumber.
He has thorns.
He has tube feet.
You'd never know until you study enough ...
... this is also an echinoderm.
Not very happy to be out of water ...
... so let me put it back.
So they are all related but look ...
... very, very different.
Related creation.
Not in an evolutionary sense,
but our Creator took the edge of living beings, echinoderms,
and he created this and this and this in a similar pattern.
And that's what we see throughout the realm of living things,
similarities and differences.
So what makes them different?
Well, genetically they share most of their genes,
but their developmental genes,
called Hox genes,
which establish these patterns in animals as it develops.
They develop from a single cell.
In one they establish a pentarradial symmetry.
In another set ten fold symmetry.
And in another form this long thin animal.
Control embryo development ...
So what you're saying when we look at this ...
... from a genetic or molecular perspective, what we find ...
... It is a really fascinating in this design.
Absolutely.
But what we heard in the conventional paradigm,
conventional history tells us that these random changes ...
... they have brought all this.
Insurance.
Back in the 18,005, when life was simple,
when they did not know what was going on inside the cell,
they did not know how complex the genetics,
You could imagine all sorts of things.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Is Genesis History?" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/is_genesis_history_10982>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In