Judgment at Nuremberg Page #16
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1961
- 186 min
- 4,046 Views
that he would die with some honor.
I went from official to official.
I begged for that.
That he be permitted the dignity
of a firing squad.
You know what happened?
He was hanged with the others...
and after that, I knew what it was to hate.
I never left the house, I never left the room.
I drank.
I hated with every fiber of my being.
I hated every American I had ever known.
But one can't live with hate, I know that.
We have to forget, if we are to go on living.
Herr Rolfe?
May it please the tribunal?
Yesterday the tribunal
witnessed some films.
They were...
shocking films...
devastating films.
As a German...
I feel ashamed that such things
could have taken place in my country.
There can never be a justification for them.
Not in generations...
not in centuries.
But I do think it was wrong...
indecent...
and terribly unfair of the prosecution...
to show such films in this case...
in this court...
at this time...
against these defendants!
And I cannot protest too strongly...
against such tactics.
What is the prosecution trying to prove?
Is it trying to prove
that the German people as a whole...
were responsible for these events?
Or that they were even aware of them?
Because if he is...
he's not stating facts...
and he knows he's not.
The secrecy of the operations,
the geographical location of the camps...
the breakdown of communications
in the last days of the war...
when the exterminations
rose into the millions...
show only too clearly
that he is not telling the truth!
The truth is...
that these brutalities were brought about
by the few extremists.
The criminals.
Very few Germans knew what was going on.
Very few.
None of us knew what was happening...
in the places shown in these films.
None of us.
But the most ironic part of it is...
that the prosecution showed these films
against these defendants...
men who stayed in power
for one reason only...
to prevent worse things from happening.
Who is the braver man?
The man who escapes,
or resigns in times of peril...
or the man who stays on his post...
at the risk of his own personal safety?
The defense will present witnesses
and letters and documents...
from religious and political refugees
all over the world...
telling how Ernst Janning saved them
from execution.
The defense will show that many times...
Ernst Janning was able
to effect mitigation of sentences...
when, without his influence,
the results would have been much worse.
The defense will show...
that Ernst Janning's personal physician
was a non-Aryan...
a Jewish man...
who he kept in attendance,
much to his own peril.
The defense presents affidavits...
from legal authorities
and famed jurists the world over...
pleading that special considerations
must be made in this case...
saying that the entire work
of Ernst Janning...
was inspired by one motive,
and one motive only:
The endeavor to preserve justice
and the concept of justice.
Now...
what has the prosecution to offer...
against this?
The prosecution, in fact...
has presented in the case of Ernst Janning
only one tangible piece of evidence.
The Feldenstein case.
A notorious case, as the defense has said.
A case which never
should have been reopened.
A case which the defense is obliged...
to review now.
The defense calls Mrs. Elsa Lindnow.
Will you raise your right hand?
I swear by God,
the Almighty and Omniscient...
that I will speak the pure truth
and will withhold and add nothing.
I do.
Mrs. Lindnow...
what is your occupation?
I am a cleaning woman.
Where are you employed?
... Grosse Platz.
- Did you know Lehman Feldenstein?
- Yes. I knew him.
In what capacity?
He was my employer in .
Do you know the witness,
Mrs. Irene Hoffman Wallner?
- Yes.
- In what capacity?
She was a tenant in the building.
Did you ever see Miss Hoffman
and Mr. Feldenstein together?
Yes.
How did this happen?
Mr. Feldenstein came to see Miss Hoffman
at her apartment.
Often?
Quite often.
Were there any occasions
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Judgment at Nuremberg" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2025. Web. 26 Jan. 2025. <https://www.scripts.com/script/judgment_at_nuremberg_210>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In