Judgment at Nuremberg Page #5
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1961
- 186 min
- 3,985 Views
"who already sapped the strength
of the state for these lesser sacrifices...
"in order to prevent our being swamped
by incompetence.
"It is better for all the world...
"if, instead of waiting to execute
degenerate offsprings for crime...
"or to let them starve for their imbecility,
society can prevent their propagation...
"by medical means in the first place.
"Three generations of imbeciles
are enough."
Do you recognize it now, Dr. Wieck?
No, sir, I don't.
Actually, there is no particular reason
you should...
since the opinion upholds
the sterilization law...
in the State of Virginia,
of the United States...
and was written and delivered
by that great American jurist...
Supreme Court Justice,
Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Now, Dr. Wieck.
In view of what you have just learned...
can you still say that sexual sterilization
was a novel National Socialist measure?
Yes, I can say it.
Because it was never before used
as a weapon against political opponents.
Do you personally know of a case...
where someone was sterilized
for political reasons?
I know that such things were done.
That's not the question.
Please answer the question.
Do you know of a case?
I don't know of any specific case,
or specific date...
I am asking you if you have any firsthand,
personal knowledge of such a case!
No, I have no such personal knowledge.
Thank you.
You are aware of the charges
in the indictment against Ernst Janning?
Yes, I am.
Can you honestly say
he is responsible for them?
Yes, I can.
Do you consider yourself
free of responsibility?
Yes, I do.
Did you ever swear
to the Civil Servant Loyalty Oath of ?
Your Honor, I object.
The witness doesn't have to answer
that question.
He's not on trial.
All Germany is on trial, Your Honor.
This tribunal placed it on trial
when it placed Ernst Janning on trial.
If responsibility is to be found,
the widest latitude is to be permitted.
Objection overruled.
Did you ever swear
to the Civil Servant Loyalty Oath of ?
Everyone did.
We are not interested in what everyone did.
We are interested in what you did.
Would you read the oath
from the Reich Law Gazette, March, ?
"I swear that I shall be obedient...
"to the leader of the German Reich
and people, Adolf Hitler.
"That I shall be loyal to him,
that I will observe the laws...
"and that I will conscientiously
fulfill my duties...
"so help me God."
Everyone swore to it.
It was mandatory.
Yes.
But you're such a perceptive man, Dr. Wieck.
You could see what was coming.
You could see that National Socialism
was leading Germany to disaster.
"It was clear to anyone
who had eyes and ears."
Didn't you realize...
what it would have meant if you,
and men like you...
would have refused to swear to the oath?
It would have meant that Hitler
could never have come to absolute power.
Why didn't you?
Why didn't you?
Can you give us an explanation?
Has it something to do with your pension?
Did your pension mean more to you
than your country?
Your Honor!
I object to the entire line of questioning,
and ask that it be stricken from the record.
I thought prosecuting counsel
was dedicated to finding responsibility.
Your Honor, I made an objection.
Prosecution is not interested
in finding responsibility?
There is responsibility for more here
than swearing to a loyalty oath...
- and you know it.
- There is indeed.
One thing that even the German machine,
with its monumental efficiency...
has been unable to destroy...
Order.
All the victims.
More victims than the world has ever known.
- They will walk into this courtroom...
- Order!
This tribunal will admonish both counsel.
It will tolerate nothing of this kind again.
We're not here to listen to outbursts
of this kind, but to serve justice.
Your Honor, I made an objection.
The objection is overruled.
The witness is excused.
Did you ever read any books by Janning?
No, I don't think so.
- The Meaning of the Law.
- How is it? Interesting?
All the books by Janning are interesting.
They're more than that.
They're a picture of an era,
its hopes, its aspirations.
They weren't very different from ours, really.
Listen to this, on the signing
of the Weimar constitution:
"Now we can look forward to a Germany
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Judgment at Nuremberg" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/judgment_at_nuremberg_210>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In