Life of Python Page #6
- Year:
- 1990
- 57 min
- 39 Views
So, uh, we had to write
endings to our pieces.
And, uh...
They just went from one
concept to the next.
And for main course, sir?
Uh, I'll have a whiskey
for main course,
and I'll follow that
with a whiskey for pudding.
Yes, sir.
And what would you like
with it, whiskey?
No. A bottle of wine.
This is the silliest sketch
I've ever been in.
Shall we stop it?
Yeah. All right.
I got fairly bored with television
somewhere around about
the middle of Python,
partly because I'd done
You know, I'd done, uh...
40 that were either Frost Reports
or 1948 Shows,
before I'd ever got to Python.
And after we'd done
about 20 of Pythons,
I, and I alone,
felt that we were beginning
to repeat ourselves
and sort of being
derivative of ourselves,
so I remember getting a bit bored,
even by about '71.
By then, there was a
I don't know why, really,
but it just...
It's like a marriage.
John's not very good
at marriages, either.
And, uh...
If you actually probably
looked at his timetables,
they'd probably
worked out the same.
He was married to Python
as long as he was
to however many wives he's had.
Morning.
Are you the registrar?
I have that function.
I was here on Saturday
getting married to a blonde,
and I'd like to have
this one instead, please.
The other one wasn't any good,
so I'd like to swap.
I have paid. I paid on Saturday.
Here's the ticket.
Ah. No. That was when
you were married.
Yes, to the wrong one.
I didn't like the colour.
This is the one I want,
so just change the forms.
certain amount of antagonism
in the third series,
About 1973.
Um, and I know that I was unpopular,
although they were nice
to me, basically,
uh, face to face,
and then they'd
sort of go off pissed off
and say rude things
about me behind my back
when I said I wanted
to drop out of the group
for television purposes.
Uh, but I think that
most of that rancor
was really isolated.
Um, it was late '73, really,
which is a pretty short period.
We didn't feel angry with John.
We'd known for years
that he didn't want to do it,
so you couldn't suddenly feel...
feel anger at it.
Um...
I think the decision of the five of us
to go on and do the fourth series
without John, um...
was kind of interesting...
Um...
Ah...
And surprising in a way
because we always said
Python was the six of us.
Take away anyone,
it wouldn't be the same.
We did six, and BBC
wanted another seven,
and at that stage I said no,
and Michael tried
to talk me into it,
and I said,
"It's not working,"
Because there was
this lovely tension
between John and Terry.
There was a series
of tensions and balances
that allowed it to work.
And without the full group,
it never works-- it never
worked quite as well.
Apart from the sheer performing,
the writing didn't
work quite as well.
Naturally, British journalists,
being the rather unhappy
creatures that they are--
Are fascinated by negative emotion
and not interested in much else.
So those few months,
sort of 6 months in
a period of 20 years,
tend to feature quite strongly
in all the things that
But other than that, um...
I think we got on
astonishingly well.
My recollection of The Holy Grail
was that even a few
months after that--
Holy Grail was '74--
We were getting on well.
And the sketch Terry
and I had written
about people going along with, uh...
They're knights, not
being on horseback,
but holding, uh, coconuts,
which they banged
together as horses,
became the beginning of, uh...
uh, of The Holy Grail.
Suddenly the idea of The
You've got these six
main characters,
Nobody really knows the stories.
No one's going to say,
"They went wrong there."
They're looking for the grail.
On the way, there's
all sorts of jokes,
and it's an area where you can make
sort of modern references
in a historical period,
which is a nice area for comedy.
How did you become king, then?
The Lady of the Lake,
her arm clad is the purest
shimmering samite,
held aloft Excalibur
from the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providence
that I, Arthur,
was to carry Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
in ponds distributing swords
is no basis for a
system of government.
Supreme executive power derives
from a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical
aquatic ceremony.
Be quiet!
You can't expect to wield
supreme executive power
because some watery tart
threw a sword at you.
Shut up!
And somebody said "What's
going to be your next film?",
and I said, "Oh, Jesus
Christ, Lust For Glory."
And uh... I liked to get
And then after that,
this became a joke we
were going to do this,
and then we thought,
this is an interesting area.
Nobody's ever done comedy
about this entire area
and what-- and then what's
funny about this area?
And so we researched it first.
We all read-- we
read all the bible,
And we read the
histories of the area
and the dead sea scrolls.
seriously researching it,
and then got together
and discussed things
for quite a long time
and realized that in fact--
You can't really make fun of J.C.
Because he's actually saying
quite good things.
Although it wasn't meant to be
a parody of Christ's life,
it was a story,
but it could take its shape
from that, I suppose.
There wasn't a story in that.
The story actually
emerged from the writing.
We still did it as sketches really,
and magically, a story emerged.
A miracle! A miracle!
He hath made the bush
fruitful by his words.
They brought forth juniper berries.
Of course they brought
forth juniper berries.
They're juniper bushes!
What do you expect?
Show us another miracle.
Do not tempt him, shallow ones.
Is not the miracle of the
juniper bushes enough?
I say, those are my juniper bushes.
They're a gift from god!
They're all I've bloody got to eat.
Clear off those bushes, go on!
Clear off, the lot of you!
Lord, I am affected
by a bald patch.
I am healed! The master healed me!
I didn't touch him.
I was blind, and now I can see.
A miracle! A miracle!
A miracle!
What we wanted to attack
was the sort of people who
listen to church leaders
and have to be told what to do.
If you look at Brian,
it's actually the most
moralistic film.
It actually suggests
positive behavior--
"I must be an individual."
It embraces a philosophy
which is actually
not present in the other films.
I remember Life Of Brian as being
an enormously happy experience
because, by coincidence, we all had
the same kind of views and
feelings about the subject,
and I think that's our
masterpiece, you know.
That's what I would
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Life of Python" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/life_of_python_12558>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In