Loose Change 2nd Edition Page #3

Year:
2006
289 Views


Likewise, the two engines should have been found

relatively intact at the Pentagon.

Instead, there was a single turbo-jet engine approximately

After this photo was published by

American Free Press,

readers wrote in to suggest that the turbine was a piece from the

Auxilliary Power Unit - APU mounted in the tail section of the 757.

Chris Bollyn contacted Honeywell in Phoenix, Arizona,

the manufacturer of a 757's APU.

An expert, speaking on the condition of anonymity

told him that:
" There's no way that's an APU wheel ".

Bollyn then contacted Pratt & Whitney and Rolls-Royce,

the two companies that manufacture 757 engines.

Pratt & Whitney pointed Bollyn towards Rolls-Royce and

John W Brown a spokesman for Rolls-Royce told Bollyn that:

" It is not a part from any Rolls-Royce engine that I'm

familiar with. "

In an article written by Karl Schwartz

President and Chief Executive Officer of

Patmos Nanotechnologies LLC and I-nets Security Systems

he believes that the piece is a JT8D Turbojet Engine

from the US Air Force A3 ScottWarrior.

The piece in the FEMA photo is

the front shaft bearing housing.

Jet engines have a center shaft which must be balanced

as well as bare seals on the front and back.

The photo shows the front seal and

a rotar hub missing its fan blades.

These blades are easily removed in a

collision such as the one found at the Pentagon.

The United States Air Force has only a few A3's left in operation,

and they're stored in Van Nuys California at

Hughes Aircraft,

which is now better known as Raytheon.

So if this piece didn't come from a 757, then where?

And where are the engines from Flight 77?

The second identifiable piece of debris was allegedly

a piece of the fuselage.

Skeptics have claimed that this is proof that Flight 77

hit the Pentagon.

But this piece could have come from any

American Airlines plane.

And why is it not singed or scratched after a 530 MPH

impact and a subsequent fireball.

The third piece of debris was a diffusor case.

Let's look a little closer at the diffusor case of a 757.

Do you see the triangular bezels around the openings?

Those are nowhere to be found on the case

found at the Pentagon.

The remainder of the debris was light enough

to have been carried by hand.

And employees at the Pentagon were seen carrying away

a large box shrouded in a blue tarp.

Why the mystery?

If Flight 77 was vaporized on impact, it would be

the first time in aviation history.

For example. August 15th, 2005.

Helios Airways Flight 522, a Boeing 737, en route to

Athens, Greece crashed into a hillside at full speed.

Fire. Tail sections. Wing sections.

Engines. Cockpit. Bodies.

Catch my drift?

Fifth. Why is the damage to the Pentagon completely

inconsistent with a Boeing 757?

These photos were taken before the roof

of the outer ring had collapsed.

The only damage to the outer wall is a single hole,

no more than 16 feet in diameter.

A Boeing 757 is 155 feet long, 44 feet high,

has a 124 foot wingspan,

and weighs almost 100 tons.

Are we supposed to believe that it disappeared into this hole,

without leaving any wreckage on the outside?

Why is there no damage from where the wings,

or the vertical stabilizer,

or the engines would have slammed

into the building?

Remember how big the engines were?

If 6 tons of steel and titanium slammed

into the Pentagon at 530 MPH,

they would bury themselves inside the building,

leaving two very distinct imprints.

And yet, the only damage on the outside of the Pentagon

is this single hole,

with no damage from where the engines

would have hit.

Why are the windows next to the hole

completely intact?

Why are the cable spools directly in front

of the hole completely untouched?

And as for the inside of the Pentagon, there's another

hole approximately 16 feet in diameter

found on the other side of the C ring,

three rings from the impact.

For that hole to have been caused by Flight 77,

the Boeing would have had to smash through

The nose of a commercial airliner is

composed of light-weight carbon.

This is what usually happens to the nose of a

commercial airliner in a plane crash.

If the nose caused this hole, where's the rest

of the debris from the plane?

So what could blow a 16 foot hole in the outer

ring of the Pentagon,

smash through 9 feet of steel reinforced concrete and

leave another 16 foot hole?

A cruise missile.

This is what Slobodan Milosevic's residence in Belgrade looked

like after a TomaHawk cruise missile had hit it.

See any similarities?

Sixth, the eyewitnesses.

Some saw a huge 100 ton commercial airliner.

" And I looked off, I was, you know looked out my window

I saw this plane, jet, American Airlines jet coming. "

Some saw a small, 8 to 20 passenger commuter plane.

" ...maybe a 20 passenger corporate jet, no

markings on the sides... "

And some saw a United States Military helicopter.

" ...when it occured, he said that he saw a helicopter

circle the building. "

" He said that it appeared to be a US Military helicopter, and

that it disappeared behind the building where the helicopter landing zone is."

" And that he then saw a fireball goin to the sky. "

So who's telling the truth?

Take this into consideration.

April Gallop was working in the Pentagon's

west side when it was hit.

In Jim Marrs' book Inside Job, April claims...

" While in the hospital, men in suits visited her more than once. "

" They never identified themselves

or what agency they worked for. "

" They didn't tell her what to say,

just made suggestions. "

" For example, to take the compensation money and shut up. "

" They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building.

They repeated this over and over. "

" But I was there, and I never saw a plane,

or even debris from a plane. "

" I figure this story is to brainwash people. "

So if a Boeing 757 didn't hit the Pentagon,

then what did?

Eyewitnesses inside and outside the building were thrown

to the ground by what they described as a shockwave.

Even the Sheraton Hotel, 1.6 Miles away,

was rocked by the blast.

A number of military personnel at the Pentagon

specifically mentioned smelling cordite.

Cordite and jet fuel have two very distinct smells.

Cordite is a compound used in ammunition, which is

comprised of nitroguanidine, nitrocellulose, and nitroglycerin.

It is cool-burning, produces little smoke and no flash,

but produces a strong detonation wave.

And, eyewitnesses described a bright, silvery flash.

Jet fuel combustion, i.e. the planes that struck the Twin Towers,

is bright yellow at best.

Watch this.

A massive smouldering fireball,

no silvery flash, no shockwave.

And at the Pentagon, a tiny bright silvery flash,

which shakes nearby buildings.

Whatever it was, it might have been related to the

two planes that were in the air after the crash.

The first one was uniformly identified as a C-130.

The second plane was an unmarked white plane flying

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes

Dylan Avery

All Dylan Avery scripts | Dylan Avery Scripts

0 fans

Submitted on August 05, 2018

Discuss this script with the community:

0 Comments

    Translation

    Translate and read this script in other languages:

    Select another language:

    • - Select -
    • 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
    • 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
    • Español (Spanish)
    • Esperanto (Esperanto)
    • 日本語 (Japanese)
    • Português (Portuguese)
    • Deutsch (German)
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • Français (French)
    • Русский (Russian)
    • ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
    • 한국어 (Korean)
    • עברית (Hebrew)
    • Gaeilge (Irish)
    • Українська (Ukrainian)
    • اردو (Urdu)
    • Magyar (Hungarian)
    • मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
    • Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Italiano (Italian)
    • தமிழ் (Tamil)
    • Türkçe (Turkish)
    • తెలుగు (Telugu)
    • ภาษาไทย (Thai)
    • Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
    • Čeština (Czech)
    • Polski (Polish)
    • Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Românește (Romanian)
    • Nederlands (Dutch)
    • Ελληνικά (Greek)
    • Latinum (Latin)
    • Svenska (Swedish)
    • Dansk (Danish)
    • Suomi (Finnish)
    • فارسی (Persian)
    • ייִדיש (Yiddish)
    • հայերեն (Armenian)
    • Norsk (Norwegian)
    • English (English)

    Citation

    Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:

    Style:MLAChicagoAPA

    "Loose Change 2nd Edition" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 20 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/loose_change_2nd_edition_12812>.

    We need you!

    Help us build the largest writers community and scripts collection on the web!

    Watch the movie trailer

    Loose Change 2nd Edition

    The Studio:

    ScreenWriting Tool

    Write your screenplay and focus on the story with many helpful features.


    Quiz

    Are you a screenwriting master?

    »
    In which year was "The Godfather" released?
    A 1972
    B 1973
    C 1974
    D 1970