![Find Side by Side on Amazon](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjY4MTE5NTE1M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODA4MzEzOA@@._V1_SX300.jpg)
Side by Side Page #4
seriously.
When they hear the film
running-when they hear the
camera, basically-everybody
brings their "a" game.
Action.
Then puts it together again,
how it carries you to-
The first time I'd ever heard
the whir of film going through
a camera, it was thrilling.
Also made me very nervous
because all of the sudden,
each take counted in a way that I had never really experienced before.
you say "action"?
Like, for me, when that camera's
connected to the money, but the
ten-minute reel is so finite.
It's almost an athletic
thing, like, "focus, focus.
Uh."
You know, like, that's good for
the-
That's just atmosphere, though,
you know?
I mean, if you want that, you
can create that, right?
a difference to actors.
I don't think it does
particularly to actors.
I think actors just infinitely
adjust to whatever they-
whatever way they have to tell it, they'll tell it.
They didn't ask for a break?
They didn't say, "Hey, can we stop?"
You're on digital now.
Yeah, but my first experience
with that was just, you know,
there was no "cut."
You know, I worked with Richard
Linklater on a film called
a Scanner Darkly...
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it was just like-
you could just go on.
Yeah, I was just, like,
"Can we please stop?"
"Stop."
No, we don't have to.
But-but I wanted to.
Camera right or left?
up to me, and he said,
"I can't work like this.
I never get to go to my trailer.
I never get my sh*t together.
I'm on my feet 14 hours a day.
I'm shooting all the time."
He actually left mason jars of
urine on the set, just, like,
over in the corner and stuff.
Just-he would go off and he would pee, and then he'd bring it back.
And that was his, like,
form of protest.
I'd previously worked on
celluloid only, really, and been
thrilled, you know, to arrive at
the holy grail of celluloid.
It was, like, amazing.
So I made the first few films on
celluloid.
I made a very big hollywood
film, The Beach,
with Leonardo Dicaprio and a big crew, and it
didn't suit me at all.
I felt it was too much away from me, really, somehow.
And so I then saw Celebration.
It wasn't so much the film.
It wasn't even the look.
It was the camera operating,
that movement of the camera.
And so I got in touch with the
guy who shot it, Anthony Dod Mantle,
and I said, "well,
I feel like I'm not doing the
right thing anymore.
Can we do something together digitally?"
Which-I didn't really know
what I was saying by saying that.
It was kind of like a new word,
in a way.
Then we came up with the script,
on consumer cameras.
But I remember Anthony saying to
me, "It's all very well working
in this format, you know," but he said, "I'll never get an Oscar."
There was a sequence in it at
character, Cillian Murphy,
wanders round a deserted London.
Hello!
And we would not have been
able to achieve the film
on film, because we had to
stop traffic.
We didn't have the money to do
it, so what we would do is, we'd
just hold the traffic briefly,
but because we were on these
cameras, we could use ten of
them 'cause they're so cheap,
and he could walk through
Central London- an area of it-
and we had ten cameras on it.
So you'd only have to stop the
traffic for a few minutes,
and then you would actually have ten shots.
That was an enormous advantage.
well, I placed cameras
around- not coincidentally and
not badly and not loosely.
best, when it's gonna be used.
But that said, you can let it
run a bit, and because it's
digital, you get something.
If you were in a wide shot
they were just, like, two or three pixels.
I mean, there was nothing there.
There was just the color.
Quality-wise, if you put it up against an exact copy of it on film,
the film would be immeasurably superior,
But you could shoot illegally and surreptitiously without people knowing.
You could do unconventional things.
And the rhythm of film, which
began and crews have learned-
you interrupted that.
I loved that freedom, and I got
the taste for it then.
And I knew once we'd shot that sequence, that I was gonna work on it now.
That was what I wanted to work on.
It makes the editor's job
extraordinary 'cause they're
often plowing through masses and
masses and masses of material.
In the 1970s and '80s,
electronics companies began
working on solutions to replace
film editing.
For over 100 years, editing
meant physically cutting and
connecting pieces of film.
When you used to go to an
editing room, they brought in
the trim basket, they took the
film out, they looked at it
through the moviola, and then
this-you remember, the white
gloves- and they were incredibly
fast at it.
I'd find the frame, I'd-you know, sometimes splicing to the
point of, you know, getting your
fingertips bloodied, you know,
and that was really the blood in the film.
So, I mean, you really had it,
and now it's, you know,
pressing little buttons.
Now this is the floppy disk
that we're all familiar with.
multiple magnetic disks, tape
store and read digitized film.
enormous and very costly.
The first thing that happened, really, that changed
everything, I think, was the
digital editing machine, which
meant our dailies had to be
converted from film into tape.
So that started a whole thing going.
system that was all digital.
We had the first Edit Droid
working in 1980,
and eventually, we sold the
system to Avid.
By the late 1980s, Avid had
developed digital editing into
a compact, cost-effective,
computer-based system.
When I first saw the Avid as
blocky and tiny, and I said,
when they get the image quality
right in about five years' time.
Why not try it on the Avid?
And, you know, I'm also one of
I like to leap into the unknown.
I remember on the English
Patient, I suddenly really
looked at the image and said,
"Oh, no."
"How am I gonna be able to do this?"
When I'd work with older
editors, they'll often talk
about the time when computers
were starting to come in
and say, you know, they were
very resistant to it because
they weren't familiar with computers.
They were just scared that they
If you pushed this button or if
you accidentally turned it off
wrong or turned it on wrong,
that everything would be gone,
whereas that could never happen
if you actually physically had
the film in your hand.
They thought, "That's not editing.
Editing is..."
So when you're editing a movie
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Side by Side" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 25 Jul 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/side_by_side_18105>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In