Sirius Page #11

---

for example, was impossible.

But now, of course, we know that

that itself is an absurd statement

as we have even toys on the market

that allow people to, you know,

play with biofeedback.

These sciences have been

around for decades.

They have been ruthlessly kept secret

because of the kleptocracy of

what I call the petro fascists,

the people who are hell-bent on maintaining

the power of a centralized petrodollar,

oil, gas, coal system.

So that does create scarcity

because that is a zero-sum game,

but when you take us off that system

onto this new system,

it's an entirely new macroeconomic order

and scarcity becomes nonexistent.

After years of disappointments,

Dr. Greer and his team are

now attempting to build

an energy research lab in Virginia

where scientists and inventors

with working prototypes

will have a safe haven to build.

So this is an example

of how the analysis is done

using what's called a genome browser,

and it's more or less a schematic

representation of the chromosomes

and at a very high level of resolution.

So the sequence that we got

from the mitochondria

tells us with extremely high confidence

that the mother was an indigenous Indian

from the Chilean area,

and the haplotype is called B2A.

Now, the other thing that

immediately fell out of the

analysis is that it's male.

It has so called Y-chromosome material.

In fact, it's got a full Y-chromosome.

It probably died in the last century

if I were to make a guess.

I can say with absolute certainty

that it is not a monkey.

Right. It is human,

or as close to human,

closer to human than

chimpanzees would be.

But when you count up the number of

mutations that we're observing,

what we're seeing is more

than what we would expect to be

caused by simple cell division.

When the sequencer is creating

or making these reads,

it's doing it more or less at random.

So what does the computer program do

that people have written and designed?

It takes every one of the little sequences

and tries to match it against the known,

and then anything that doesn't

match, it puts in a little side file

and says, "this is unknown. "

At a certain point, when

enough knowns are matched,

I can feel comfortable saying,

"Ah, this is human," right?

But if I'm not careful,

and I don't pay attention to what's

in the garbage can, right

what the computer program

is throwing away,

I could literally be throwing the baby

out with the bath water.

What we've done is we've scaled back,

and we're seeing several chromosomes and

pieces of chromosomes across the top

which basically leaves us with

a very strange conundrum.

Right. Here you've got this six-inch-tall

let's call it human, right,

because the DNA says that so far it's human

at least the way that we're looking at it.

This gene PCN which is known to be associated

with primordial dwarfism,

we don't have any mutations here.

It lived to the age of six to eight.

Obviously, it was

breathing, it was eating,

it was metabolizing,

and it wasn't living in an environment

where there was a lot of

advanced medical attention

that was given to it to allow

it to live to that age.

Calls into question how big the thing

might have been when it was born.

So genetically you might explain that

by saying that there's some

advanced aging mutation,

something that caused the bone

to age anomalously quickly.

A gene that's known to be

associated with progeria,

that also, no changes there.

So the next problem, of course, is the ribs

and the number of ribs in the specimen:

only ten whereas there's

supposed to be twelve.

So there are no mutations

which are specifically associated

with that kind of phenomenon

because it's rarely, if ever, seen.

The digits are all correct.

The hands are all correct.

There are problems with the face.

So there's a mid-face hypoplasia,

and then there's the larger skull.

So again, I think, in summary,

there are genes associated

with any one or two

of the anomalies that we

see in the specimen,

but there is no mutation which is known

to accommodate or call for

all of the mutations.

Even with the things

that we know could be assigned to

one or more of the anomalies,

we don't find them in the genetics

of this specimen.

That leaves open the question:

what genetics is causing the anomalies

that we are observing?

So although I answered this thinking

DNA was the answer,

it made me realize that in the context

of the bigger biology questions

that there are other levels of control

that need to be understood and answered:

the non-coding RNA, epigenetics, etcetera,

and thin gs that we probably

haven't even thought of yet.

So if I just look at this base

pair 19,800,000 or so

at this edge of the open region.

I can go all the way over here,

and now I'm at 21,000 or 22,000.

So the answer's not finished,

and it's not as easy as, actually, frankly,

I thought it was going to

be at the beginning.

So that's basically 2,000,000 base pairs

of DNA where nothing seems to sit.

It's just like the way societies do things;

they try to fit things in boxes.

We have literally written a computer

program that does exactly that,

tries to fit it into the box.

Doesn't seem very efficient

so on that basis

people would call it junk,

but I think we now know

that there's any of a number

of other features

of what DNA's doing in there.

It is expressed,

and so we need to be careful, obviously,

that we don't let our instincts

or the programs that we write

to match our instincts

make the decisions for us.

No matter what, for me,

this has been a fascinating

more than an exercise.

As soon as I've collated this information

into a form that other people

can take advantage of

and it's accepted for publication,

I'm just going to put it out on the web.

You know, I don't have the resources

to study and follow down every single angle

that this opens up, but you know,

maybe there is a listener out there who

will be sufficiently intrigued by this

to do the analyses themselves.

And maybe they'll find

something that I missed.

Great.

If additional samples or examples

are seen of this,

I'll be the first in line

to want to sequence it

because then all bets are off.

I want to say other things here,

but I also don't want to

open myself up for,

you know, attack.

This search may have uncovered

a major finding about life in the universe

and its origins.

What is this being?

Could it be a missing link in evolution?

Could it be an entirely new species

or simply a disease we have

never seen before?

Or could this be an extraterrestrial being

from another world?

Whatever the case maybe,

this challenges the boundaries

of human scientific knowledge.

Dr. Garry Nolan has set a new precedent

for scientific investigation and rigor

in the realm of the seemingly impossible.

Now, we have now over

4,000 cases of extraterrestrial vehicles

that have landed,

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes