The New Watchdogs

---

WARNING:

WARNING:

WARNING:

THIS FILM BEGINS

WITH AN OLD:

BLACK-AND-WHITE

TV PICTURE:

I don't often confess,

but I must admit

that until recently,

I'd never read Paul Nizan.

Nizan was an angry young man,

raging against all the injuries

that the world inflicted then, and now.

He's angry with the philosophers

he heard lecturing at the Sorbonne,

talking about Man with a capital "M"

but never about men with a small "m",

men starving to death

or murdered in wars

or beaten up in police stations

all over the world.

He's angry with the liberal

bourgeois writers of his time

whose names we all know,

great writers who spend so much time

contemplating

every nook and cranny of their souls

that the y're always 20 years too old

to tell the young who ask the m

when to act, and how.

Paul Nizan is a wake-up call.

That's why you should read him.

You may say,

"Why introduce us

to such a rude young man?"

His rudeness is why you should read him.

We don't lack polite writers.

What we lack, and need, are rude ones.

This plea for a writer

raging against the establishment

was broadcast in prime time

on one of France's two TV channels.

In the 1960s,

government control over the TV news

was not always very subtle.

The information Minister

felt free to invite himself on air

to unveil his revamped news program.

We've invited Minister Alain Peyrefitte

to present the new format

that he has commissioned.

Minister, would you like

to explain to our viewers

why you ordered

the se changes

to the news program?

First, because all recipes grow stale.

Unless we change, we become boring.

For example,

the idea of illustrating

the Council of Ministers' meeting

with scenes of their cars

arriving at the Elyse Palace

was new at first,

but after ten years of repetition,

the festival of car doors

opening and closing

has grown a little tedious.

For the journalists of today,

the se scenes from April 1963

epitomize a dark age,

the prehistory of their profession.

Happily, most of them agree

things are very different now.

I've been in TV since 1972.

I've seen a censorship

that went unsaid,

I've seen self-censorship

that went unsaid,

and I've seen the gradual rise,

under President Mitterrand,

mostly during the power-sharing period,

of a total freedom

that's never been revoked.

The Government

had to open up or lose its credibility.

In the old days,

Alain Peyrefitte had a direct line

to every office

in the public broadcasting HQ.

That's all history.

We've come a long way, no question!

"We've come a long way."

Since then, TV has burst into color.

There are many more channels.

For most journalists,

news reporting today

rests on three pillars:

Independence,

Objectivity and Pluralism,

which safeguard

the media's democratic role.

So?

Should we, like Paul Nizan,

rage against the "watchdogs",

the se journalists,

press pundits and media stars

who, like the writers of the 1930s,

bow down to the powers that be?

Of course not.

All that has changed.

THE NEW WATCHDOGS

So we have taken steps to ensure

that the French TV news

accurately mirrors

every highway and byway

of France and the world.

What a classic!

It's extraordinary to see

the Information Minister

telling the public,

"These are the steps that we,

the Government, have taken

to improve the TV news."

It seems long ago?

It seems antiquated...

or Soviet.

Antiquated or Soviet?

Anne Sinclair and Christine Ockrent,

two celebrity news anchors,

agree that their profession

has moved on.

The guests are unanimous.

These days, journalists

have no ties with politicians.

They do their job,

free of any outside influence.

We tested this the ory

at the National Assembly,

at the 2009 Political Book Prize

ceremony,

a rare occasion

when top journalists agree

to mix with politicians.

Don't be surprised

to see the former Head of News

of France's key public TV channel

kissing an ex-interior Minister

convicted of breach of trust.

It's all an act.

Behind the se social smiles and kisses,

the newshounds are ready to pounce.

The Fourth Estate

knows that independence

is a daily struggle.

Today's journalists take no prisoners.

Raphalle Bacqu,

the prizewinner for her book

on recent prime ministers,

doesn't mince words.

I know no other country

where you could find

twelve such eminent politicians

so skilled at analyzing and explaining

what power is about.

France can rest easy.

It's still the great country of politics.

Used to parrying such deadly blows,

the Speaker of the National Assembly

has the perfect riposte.

...how much

we appreciate

the intelligence

and judgment

of the se great writers and voices

of French political journalism.

The Speaker knows

he's not among friends.

Take Laurent Joffrin,

ex-chief editor

of an opposition newspaper

that prides itself

on keeping politicians

at arm's length.

IF YOU SAY "TU"

TO THE PRESIDENT,

ARE YOU CLOSER:

TO INFORMATION:

OR CLOSER TO POWER?

Saying "tu" means you're too friendly.

People call their workmates "tu".

As working journalists, we say "tu"

to many people who aren't our friends.

Talking to the French President

is a different matter.

There has to be

a respectable distance.

Sincere belief or sales pitch?

A few years ago,

Laurent Joffrin said...

I say "tu" to Sarko,

like he does to everybody.

So what?

It doesn't stop me bawling him out...

NEWS IS A BATTLE

When it comes to bawling out Sarkozy,

Laurent Joffrin knows his stuff.

About economic policy...

France's economy

is performing somewhat better

than its neighbors.

It would be unfair

to deny the Government credit for it.

Given the se good results,

my question is...

My week is starting well!

I'm here to help.

What comes next?

Wait for it.

After what you just said...

Get it off your chest!

Honestly...

We respect the facts,

even if they favor you.

Does it hurt, Doctor?

The director of Libration

has needled French presidents for years

with his no-nonsense,

almost impudent style.

Monsieur Chirac,

my question may offend you,

but presidential candidates

have to face tough questions.

Absolutely.

A storm of debate

has been raised

by a newspaper article

concerning an apartment

that you or your family

rents in central Paris...

- I do.

- You do?

You've been criticized

for benefiting, in a way,

from a disproportionately

low rent

considering the amenities

and nature of the apartment.

You have said

it's all legal and above board

and nobody has doubted your word,

but isn't it awkward, image-wise?

You risk being regarded as someone

who benefits, in all honesty,

as everyone agrees...

who benefits, as others do too,

from privileges

that ordinary citizens don't have,

since you seem to pay

a very low rent for that apartment.

Your question

doesn't shock me at all.

One minute and two seconds

to ask a question.

Chirac is on the ropes.

NEWS IS A BATTLE

I always admire and feel grateful...

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes