Yes, Prime Minister: Re-elected Page #2
- Year:
- 2013
- 80 min
- 911 Views
back to our screens.
It's as good a time as any
to revive Yes, Prime Minister.
Nothing has changed,
except cosmetically,
since it was first on in 1980.
Our very limited ambition
about what
happens in Whitehall.
vein of humour and public interest.
And it was extraordinarily
fortunate, but the result of it
is that...there's never
a shortage of things to write about.
Collapse of conference,
collapse of backbench support,
collapse of coalition, collapse
of cabinet, collapse of my career!
This is the biggest disaster
since Dunkirk!
It is very much
a continuation of the original.
And we've got two absolutely
marvellous characters,
er, playing Jim and Humphrey,
which I think will be
an eye-opener to people,
not that they're better than Paul
and Nigel, but they're different,
but they're really very,
very well observed and very funny.
'It's obviously
extraordinarily gratifying
'to have created characters
'that seem to have become
part of the vocabulary.
'It didn't occur to us, I think,
that we were doing that.'
We didn't set out to change
the world, we just set out to...
To amuse an audience.
..to amuse an audience.
Stepping into the Prime Ministerial
role of Jim Hacker
whilst his calculating
Cabinet Secretary, Sir Humphrey,
and screen actor, Henry Goodman.
HENRY GOODMAN:
I'm genuinely excitedthat these scripts have embraced
new and edgy stuff.
Some of the things that happen
in these episodes
would not have been in previous
episodes
some years ago.
Why didn't you know?
everybody else understood
what was going on.
they couldn't make sense of it.
Why couldn't they?
Because it didn't make sense!
The balance between Sir Humphrey
and Jim Hacker
has evolved through
the two of us playing the two roles,
and that necessarily has some
differences from our predecessors.
But I think they're exciting
differences, and I'm not scared
of Nigel and Paul's performances,
which were absolutely phenomenal.
And also, Henry and I have known
each other for so long, it's fun
to investigate our own histories,
in a way, subliminally, I feel.
Yes, yeah, absolutely.
Within the characters.
Yeah.
How happy is the Prime Minister
about his future?
He's as happy as a rat-catcher
on a rubbish dump.
The Prime Minister is as happy
as an Environmental Health Officer
I was absolutely terrified when
they offered me Bernard originally,
simply because
I watched the original TV series,
back in the 1980s.
I was doing my A-level politics
and I was really rather...in awe.
What about Bernard?
Now, he is the kind of character
I'm really sympathetic to,
and of all of them the three
of them, I've seen Bernards.
Absolutely.
Over and over again.
Indeed, and they are, you know,
Private Secretary.
It's not the reality of the
Civil Service now, you know,
you'd be much more likely to have
a Bernadette
than a...than a Bernard.
Quiet, please...
Although Bernard
is still very much a bloke,
there is a welcome addition
of a female SPAD - Claire Sutton,
Special Political Advisor to Jim.
'She's kind of like his right-hand
man, really.
'And she's very good at kind
of thinking straight'
in stressful situations
and, you know, just...being cogent.
He's not doing that.
If I could
mention the Kumranistan loan!
You can't!
Not until Kumranistan has definitely
signed on the dotted line
and not until this euro business
with the European Central bank
is sorted out.
Phone them back.
Pretend to be helpful.
It'd be very nice to see
a woman SPAD.
And Zoe Telford is a fantastic
actress, she's really good
and she's just got a great
and a real intelligence as well.
I think she'll be great.
Yeah, I
think she'll run rings around them.
We're all agreed it's the perfect
moment for the return
of Yes, Prime Minister.
But I wonder what former Prime
Minister Tony Blair makes of it...
Well, it's a very important
question,
and I'm glad that you've asked it,
and what I think we've got
to address is a very serious issue,
and it's absolutely right
that you said it, and what we're
doing, and what we said,
to address is a very serious issue,
and it's absolutely right
that you said it, and what we're
doing, and what we said,
and what we intend to say,
and what we intend to act upon,
is that very thing.
So in answer to that question,
is that very thing.
So in answer to that question,
I think we've got
to look at it very carefully.
Thanks, Tony.
Coming up, we'll reveal
which of these faces
was a secret source for the writers.
And relive the moment
Mrs Thatcher got in on the act.
Capital, my dear Sir Humphrey,
capital.
You'll know exactly where to start.
Britain's best-loved
governmental sitcom is back.
Award-winning writers Antony Jay
and Jonathan Lynn have brought back
Jim Hacker, Sir Humphrey
and Bernard for a brand-new series.
I really do admire your courage,
Prime Minister.
Oh, God!
Have I been courageous?
But back in the '70s, when
Antony first thought of the idea
for a governmental sitcom,
Jonathan was less than impressed,
and Yes, Minister
nearly became No, Minister!
It was Tony's idea.
I thought it was a terrible idea
and declined his suggestion
that we do this together.
looking for something new to write
and I couldn't think of anything,
so I phoned Tony who...
I said, "Have you done anything
with that idea yet?"
He said,
"No, are you interested now?"
And I said, "I don't know,
but it doesn't really have anything
"that would normally make people
watch a television series.
"It's three middle-aged
to elderly men,
"sitting around
and talking about government."
You know?
There are no women
or almost no women.
There's no action.
There's no sex.
There's no violence.
That's why we took such trouble
to make it interesting
and authentic and well researched,
so that even if they didn't
really get the jokes,
or laugh very much,
it might be interesting enough
for them to say, "Oh, I didn't know
that, that was quite interesting."
You know.
"Maybe
But we didn't expect it
to be a long-running series.
No.
to put on a comedy about government.
The pilot of Yes, Minister
was made in 1979.
But the BBC backed
out of launching it
until after the general election,
for fear of affecting the outcome.
So as the country went to the polls
to choose between
Callaghan and Thatcher,
Jim Hacker was consigned
to his constituency until 1980.
Hello and welcome.
Thank you, Sir Humphrey.
I believe you know each other.
Yes, we did cross swords
when the Minister gave me
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Yes, Prime Minister: Re-elected" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 21 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/yes,_prime_minister:_re-elected_23817>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In