The Small Back Room Page #5
- Year:
- 1949
- 131 Views
Anything I can do?
No, I don't think so.
- Thank you, sir.
- You sure?
Yes.
Uh, quite s-s-sure, sir.
- Well, unless, uh...
- Unless what?
Well, if... if you w-w-wouldn't mind, sir...
if I could get away
a f-few minutes early s-sometimes.
Sh-Sh-Sh-She's all on her own,
you see, sir, and...
if I could...
get away a bit early, sir.
Yes, of course.
I'll tell Sergeant Major Rose.
- Today?
- Oh, n-no, sir.
N- Not on a W... Wednesday, sir.
Sue?
I'm darned if I will.
At the third stroke...
it will be 7:
53 and 10 seconds.What's the use?
Sammyl
Oh, Sammy.
Thanks for all your help!
Where are you going, Sammy?
I did try to ring up.
There's something wrong with the line.
- Oh, to hell with the line!
- You didn't drink any, did you?
No, I didn't drink any.
I thought we agreed
never to work late on Wednesdays.
But, darling, it's Tuesday.
- Tuesday?
- Tuesday, the 23rd of March.
I ought to know. I've typed it all day.
Taylor said it was Wednesday.
- What day is it?
- Day? Monday.
- But yesterday was Monday.
- Why ask then?
Where were you going, Sammy?
I don't know.
A woman?
Maybe.
How about me?
Gentlemen, I have called this meeting
on the minister's instructions...
to clear up the position
of the Reeve's gun.
- There have been extensive
demonstrations and experiments.
The question is now
what have those experiments shown...
and what are we going to do about it?
That's all I have to say.
Now you talk and I'll listen.
Professor Mair?
The Reeve's gun, Mr. Chairman...
is one of the most promising
developments I've seen...
from some points of view.
But that's only an opinion.
I should like to hear other people
before being dogmatic.
Um, we don't like the Reeve's,
Mr. Chairman.
You don't?
No.
It has a lot of snags
from the user point of view, and, uh...
we don't think it has sufficient
advantages to offset them.
That's an infernal noise going on here.
One could do with a course of lip reading
at these meetings.
Well, of course,
that's just the question.
What is the balance of advantage
and disadvantage?
Mr. Chairman.
It might be of interest to the meeting
to hear the views...
of the National
Scientific Advisory Council...
for which I have the honor
to be chairman.
Please.
The National Scientific Advisory Council...
For which he has the honor to be chairman.
Is the body officially deputed
by the cabinet...
to offer advice
on all major scientific issues.
There are so many overlapping
and uncoordinated research organizations...
it was felt that science should speak
with one authoritative voice.
I need hardly add that our opinion
upon the Reeve's gun...
was not requested
until very late in the day.
Having been requested, however, my colleagues
and I approached this development...
purely as scientists.
As if everyone else had approached it
as income tax inspectors.
A select committee was formed,
and every facility was afforded us.
- Our conclusion was that,
scientifically speaking...
It was not a sound conception.
Not at all a sound conception.
In fact, I go further...
and say that no scientist
could possibly feel happy...
about many of the principles involved.
I'm interested to hear that, Mr. Chairman...
because from our unscientific point of view,
that's what we thought.
Just what scientific principles
do you think are unsound?
We're talking about
different sorts of principles.
We didn't like it
because it had user snags.
Yes.
Perhaps Mr. Brine could tell us who were
his colleagues on this select committee.
Professor Charn, Dr. Golder
and Dr. Peace.
One crystallographer...
one vital statistician...
one embryologist and, uh...
Dr. Brine is, of course, one of the best-known
organic chemists in the kingdom.
Good. Now we know where we are.
No love lost between these back room boys.
By the way, your committee did see
the gun firing, I take it.
We were not actually present
at the trials.
But you saw the gun fire?
You didn't just look at it
as a piece of furniture?
Scientific fellows, of course.
No, we did not see the gun firing.
Well, well.
Oh, never mind.
Mr. Chairman, I'm not a scientist...
but my reading
of the figures that I've seen...
shows that in practice we don't get
those advantages that are being talked about.
is taking altogether too gloomy a view.
Perhaps, Mr. Chairman,
you would allow Mr. Rice and my staff...
to read his summary of the figures.
Please.
These figures are averages
of firings at 85 yards.
Carry on the blackout, sir?
The propellant type throughout
was cordite mark nine.
Charge weight in pounds:2.75.
...1,980.
Penetration in inches:2.087.
Charge weight in pounds:3.5.
Muzzle velocity in feet per second:2, 183.
Penetration in inches:2.28.
With moving targets,
average range:
90 yards.Lightest charge weight:2.75 pounds.
Average time per round: Eight seconds.
Heaviest charge weight: Four pounds.
Average time between rounds:22 seconds.
Small charge...
small penetration, minimum interval.
Large charge... greatest penetration,
maximum interval.
The summary will, of course,
be circulated.
I should like to ask Mr. Rice
what it all adds up to.
Why, I think Professor Mair's already
given the view of the section.
And you share that view?
- Oh, come. It's scarcely a fair question, is it?
- Why not?
Well, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Rice is one
of Professor Mair's junior officers.
Quite. I don't think you can ask Rice
to argue with his chief, Holland.
Mr. Chairman, I want to be quite frank.
We don't like this gun.
that we're wrong.
Professor Mair suggested that his expert
should give us the figures.
Surely I'm entitled to know
After all, this is an important matter.
It is not the prestige of a particular
department that is involved...
but men's lives.
If the Reeve's gun is accepted,
sooner or later men will have to fight with it.
If we've been too optimistic,
they'll be the sufferers. We shan't.
Well, well, Mr. Chairman.
No one wants to hide anything.
If Colonel Holland would like Mr. Rice's views,
I have no objection at all.
Well, Mr. Rice?
that the idea is excellent.
And the weapon?
Would you be happy to see it
accepted in its present form...
on those figures?
No, I shouldn't.
You must realize that you can have ideas
that'll win the war four times over...
but it still won't do anybody any good
unless you can sell them.
We're not in a university department now.
No, nor in an advertising agency,
where you belong.
Now, look here, Sammy. You may think you're a great
big scientist and I'm just a commercial stooge...
but the plain fact is, if you make
a mess of things, I have to clear it up!
And the equally plain fact is the stuff you build
a reputation on comes chiefly out of my head!
I'm not a politician or a salesman,
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Small Back Room" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_small_back_room_21333>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In